On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 5:26 AM Pietro Monteiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ping.
Ok for the rest of the series. Thanks, Andrea > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026, at 11:44 PM, Pietro Monteiro wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > >>> Thanks. I pushed the first 2 patches to trunk and the rest to a branch on > >>> the forge. > >>> I also opened a pull request: > >>> https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/137 > >> > >> Thanks again for doing this. > >> > >> Everyone else, > >> It would be useful to for folks to test this on different targets. > >> Solaris and Darwin are the 2 big ones which I don't have really way to > >> test, rather I Have not tried on the cfarm yet. Mingw is the other one > >> that I don't really have access to. It has already been tested on > >> x86_64-linux-gnu and the results were clean. > > > > I regtested on cfarm216, sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, and the results look good. > > There's a bit of weirdness about three tests now passing: > > > > Tests that now work, but didn't before (3 tests): > > > > g++: g++.dg/modules/pr99425-2_a.X -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) > > libgo: text/template > > libitm: libitm.c/simple-2.c execution test > > > > > >>> I will test this on aarch64-linux-gnu tomorrow or the next day. > > > > Thanks, > > pietro
