On Thu, 2026-04-09 at 19:11 +0530, Manjunath S Matti wrote:
> Hi Avinash,
> 
> On 08/04/26 8:06 am, Avinash Jayakar wrote:
> > From: Avinash Jayakar <[email protected]>
> > 
> > A few types were not tested with the patch
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-March/711326.html
> > i.e., (signed/unsigned) long long, and long support in 32 bit
> > system.
> > This patch adds support for long long in 64 bit system and for long
> > in
> > 32 bit.
> > Although the generic builtin __atomic_compare_exchange does support
> > long
> > long even in 32 bit, it does not generate larx instructions in
> > assembly,
> > and instead expands using internal function. Therefore decided not
> > to
> > support the new builtin for this type in 32 bit.
> > 
> > Added a few more tests for checking this failure scenario in 32
> > bit, and
> > separated out 32 bit tests from 64 bit tests.
> > 
> > Regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions, ok for
> > trunk?
> > 
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >     PR target/124800
> >     * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc (rs6000_expand_builtin):
> > Add
> >     long long support. Expand using SI mode for long type in
> > 32 bit.
> >     * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def: New builtins for long
> > long.
> >     * config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def: New overloads for
> > long
> >     long.
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >     PR target/124800
> >     * gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c: Run only for 64 bit or
> > where
> >     __int128 is supported.
> >     * gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-fail.c: New test.
> >     * gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c: New test.
> > ---
> >   gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc           | 15 ++++++++--
> >   gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def         |  2 ++
> >   gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def         |  4 +++
> >   .../gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-fail.c     | 18 ++++++++++++
> >   .../gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c          | 29
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c   |  5 +++-
> >   6 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-
> > fail.c
> >   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
> > b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
> > index bbf60de3b1b..845dd4c1e50 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc
> > @@ -3288,7 +3288,8 @@ rs6000_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target,
> > rtx /* subtarget */,
> >         || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_HI
> >         || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_SI
> >         || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI
> > -      || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_TI)
> > +      || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_TI
> > +      || fcode == RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI_LL)
> >       {
> >         machine_mode mode; // Get mode based on BIF ID (QImode,
> > SImode, etc.)
> >   
> > @@ -3307,13 +3308,21 @@ rs6000_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx
> > target, rtx /* subtarget */,
> >       icode = CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localsi;
> >       break;
> >     case RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI:
> > -     mode = DImode;
> > -     icode = CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localdi;
> > +     mode = TARGET_32BIT ? SImode : DImode;
> > +     icode = TARGET_32BIT ?
> > CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localsi
> > +                          :
> > CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localdi;
> >       break;
> >     case RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_TI:
> >       mode = TImode;
> >       icode = CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localti;
> >       break;
> > +   case RS6000_BIF_PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI_LL:
> > +     if (TARGET_32BIT)
> > +       error ("Invalid arguments to %qs",
> > +              "__builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local");
> 
> Your Error message is a generic string that doesn't specify which
> type 
> is problematic.
> 
> As a suggestion, can we have a more meaningful or specific error
> message

Hi Manjunath,

Apologies for addressing the comment so late. You are right, in the
newer patch for implementing this builtin, I have added most of the
error messages which should be helpful when interacting with this
builtin.

Regards,
Avinash
> 
> " long long not supported in 32-bit mode for
> __buitin_ppc_atomic_cas_local"
> 
> > +     mode = DImode;
> > +     icode = CODE_FOR_atomic_compare_and_swap_localdi;
> > +     break;
> >     default:
> >       gcc_unreachable ();
> >     }
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > index 577c9d6c8f0..a7918b4184d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> > @@ -255,6 +255,8 @@
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_SI nothing {}
> >     bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local_di (long *, long *, long *,
> > const int, const int, const int);
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI nothing {}
> > +  bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local_di_ll (long long *, long
> > long *, long long *, const int, const int, const int);
> > +    PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI_LL nothing {}
> >     bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local_ti (vsq *, vsq *, vsq *,
> > const int, const int, const int);
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_TI nothing {}
> >   
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> > b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> > index 8f2fa978475..6ee90c0f8c7 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> > +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> > @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_SDI
> >     bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (unsigned long *, unsigned
> > long *, unsigned long *, const int, const int, const int);
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_UDI
> > +  bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (signed long long *, signed
> > long long *, signed long long *, const int, const int, const int);
> > +    PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI_LL PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_SDI_LL
> > +  bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (unsigned long long *,
> > unsigned long long *, unsigned long long *, const int, const int,
> > const int);
> > +    PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_DI_LL PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_UDI_LL
> >     bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (vsq *, vsq *, vsq *, const
> > int, const int, const int);
> >       PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_TI PPC_ATOMIC_CAS_STI
> >     bool __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (vuq *, vuq *, vuq *, const
> > int, const int, const int);
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-fail.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-fail.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..c466d7bb18e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32-fail.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target ilp32 } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -m32" } */
> > +
> > +#define TESTS \
> > +  X(signed long long, sdi) \
> > +  X(unsigned long long, udi)
> > +
> > +#define X(T, name) \
> > +bool word_exchange_##name (T *ptr, T *expected, T * desired) \
> > +{ \
> > +  return __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (ptr, expected, desired,
> > 0, \
> > +                                    __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST,
> > __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); \
> > +}
> > +
> > +TESTS
> > +
> > +/* { dg-excess-errors "This test is expected to fail on 32-bit" {
> > target ilp32 } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..6763cee5ff8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst-32.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target ilp32 } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -m32" } */
> > +
> > +#define TESTS \
> > +  X(signed char, qi) \
> > +  X(unsigned char, uqi) \
> > +  X(short, hi) \
> > +  X(signed short, shi) \
> > +  X(unsigned short, uhi) \
> > +  X(int, si) \
> > +  X(signed int, ssi) \
> > +  X(unsigned int, usi) \
> > +  X(long, di) \
> > +  X(signed long, sdi) \
> > +  X(unsigned long, udi)
> > +
> > +#define X(T, name) \
> > +bool word_exchange_##name (T *ptr, T *expected, T * desired) \
> > +{ \
> > +  return __builtin_ppc_atomic_cas_local (ptr, expected, desired,
> > 0, \
> > +                                    __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST,
> > __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); \
> > +}
> > +
> > +TESTS
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlbarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 2 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlharx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 3 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlwarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 6 } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c
> > index 6ebd2ebbc28..27c98c37acf 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/acmp-tst.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >   /* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
> >   /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> >   
> >   #define TESTS \
> > @@ -13,6 +14,8 @@
> >     X(long, di) \
> >     X(signed long, sdi) \
> >     X(unsigned long, udi) \
> > +  X(signed long long, sdi2) \
> > +  X(unsigned long long, udi2) \
> >     X(vector signed __int128, sti) \
> >     X(vector unsigned __int128, uti)
> >   
> > @@ -28,5 +31,5 @@ TESTS
> >   /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlbarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 2 } } */
> >   /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlharx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 3 } } */
> >   /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlwarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 3 } } */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mldarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 3 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mldarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 5 } } */
> >   /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlqarx +[0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-
> > 9]+,1} 2 } } */
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Manjunath S Matti

Reply via email to