On May 5, 2026, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think this is a good use of time.
> I would prefer to just add a static_assert to reject -mlong-double-64 > and say "don't do that, this isn't supported" Ugh, that's exactly what we had two patches ago :-( (now three, sorry about misnaming the macros, thanks for the fix) Now it works; the only pending patch in this set was the attempt to apply the same preprocessor test to simd.h, where I made the same mistake. I could fix it and resubmit it, but I get that the preference is to not mess with it any further. It's just a micro-optimization, and I'm not even sure it actually optimizes anything, so I don't mind at all if we just drop it. I'll proceed accordingly. Thanks! -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
