On Wed, 6 May 2026, Tamar Christina wrote:

> The loop
> 
> void add(int N, int *__restrict a, int *__restrict b, int *__restrict c) {
>   for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
>     c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
>     if (i > 1000) {
>         break;
>     }
>   }
> }
> 
> is an example of a loop that we have started vectorizing using early break
> vectorization.  However the given loop is not actually an early break loop as
> the condition on the exit introduces a MAX bound on N.
> 
> This patch teaches IVcannon to identify such cases and rewrite the latch
> condition from i < N to i < MIN (N, C) where C is a constant.

The pattern-matching in IVCANON looks quite ugly.  loop header copying
(run after ifcombine...) exposes

  if (i_21 == 1001)
    goto <bb 5>; [1.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 4>; [99.00%]

  <bb 4> [local count: 1004539166]:
  i_18 = i_21 + 1;
  if (N_13(D) > i_18)
    goto <bb 3>; [94.50%]
  else
    goto <bb 5>; [5.50%]

  <bb 5> [local count: 69202658]:

which looks like a ifcombine opportunity to me.  I recently reviewed
a patch to do extra if-combining from tail merging.

That said, IVCANON doesn't look like the correct place to fuse
two exit tests?

> It then tries to find an appropriate edge to remove from the loop iteration.
> 
> Concretely instead of
> 
> .L8:
>         add     v31.4s, v30.4s, v27.4s
>         add     v30.4s, v30.4s, v28.4s
>         cmpeq   p15.s, p7/z, z31.s, #0
>         b.any   .L41
>         ldr     q31, [x9, x4]
>         add     w5, w5, 4
>         ldr     q29, [x8, x4]
>         add     v31.4s, v31.4s, v29.4s
>         str     q31, [x6, x4]
>         add     x4, x4, 16
>         cmp     w7, w5
>         bne     .L8
> 
> we now generate:
> 
> .L4:
>         ldr     q31, [x1, x0]
>         ldr     q30, [x2, x0]
>         add     v30.4s, v31.4s, v30.4s
>         str     q30, [x3, x0]
>         add     x0, x0, 16
>         cmp     x4, x0
>         bne     .L4
> 
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu,
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> -m32, -m64 and no issues.
> Ok for master?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tamar
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/113134
>       * tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc (redundant_with_constrained_latch_exit_p,
>       (find_latch_constrained_niter): New.
>       (try_unroll_loop_completely): Explicitly check exit.
>       (canonicalize_loop_induction_variables): Use them.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/113134
>       * gcc.dg/ivcannon-pr113134.c: New test.
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ivcannon-pr113134.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ivcannon-pr113134.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49fd231cf436211ae3779c96def8a833446ca4fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ivcannon-pr113134.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-ivcanon-details -std=c99" } */
> +
> +void add(int N, int *__restrict a, int *__restrict b, int *__restrict c) {
> +  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
> +    c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
> +    if (i > 1000) {
> +        break;
> +    }
> +  }
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {exit edges updated and IV rewritten to} 
> "ivcanon" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc
> index 
> fb2ef44a3d3c8504823b75747da1656ce2854bfd..beb3157db44b51bf656d8af143cc1706e322ea6b
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc
> @@ -129,6 +129,133 @@ create_canonical_iv (class loop *loop, edge exit, tree 
> niter,
>    update_stmt (cond);
>  }
>  
> +/* Return true if exit E becomes redundant once LATCH_EXIT is rewritten with 
> a
> +   constrained latch count.  This is intentionally narrow: the non-exit path
> +   must flow directly to LATCH_EXIT in the same iteration.  */
> +
> +static bool
> +redundant_with_constrained_latch_exit_p (class loop *loop, edge e,
> +                                      edge latch_exit,
> +                                      HOST_WIDE_INT maxiter)
> +{
> +  class tree_niter_desc desc;
> +  edge nonexit;
> +  gphi_iterator gpi;
> +
> +  /* Candidate exit must not be the latch exit and must execute at most
> +     once per iteration.  i.e. no other flow through the loop.  */
> +  if (e == latch_exit || !just_once_each_iteration_p (loop, e->src))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* The candidate exit must dominate the latch, otherwise it would be unsafe
> +     to elide the candidate edge and have the latch assume it's role.  */
> +  if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, latch_exit->src, e->src))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  nonexit = EDGE_SUCC (e->src, 0);
> +  if (nonexit == e)
> +    nonexit = EDGE_SUCC (e->src, 1);
> +
> +  /* The condidate edge must fall through to the latch.  This might be too
> +     strict, but it's safe for now.  The reason for this is to prevent a 
> second
> +     branch like a diamond shape that can reach the latch from the edge.  */
> +  if (nonexit->dest != latch_exit->src)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* Since we want to use the latch for the candidate edge exit, they must 
> have
> +     been going to the same destination.  */
> +  if (e->dest != latch_exit->dest)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* The candidate edge must have a known, constant niters and it must be
> +     smaller or equal to our maximum iteration count.  */
> +  if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, e, &desc, false)
> +      || !integer_zerop (desc.may_be_zero)
> +      || TREE_CODE (desc.niter) != INTEGER_CST
> +      || !wi::geu_p (wi::to_widest (desc.niter), maxiter))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* Check that the candidate exit and the latch exit compute the same value
> +     otherwise rewriting the candidate exit to go through the latch is not a
> +     valid thing to do.  */
> +  for (gpi = gsi_start_phis (e->dest); !gsi_end_p (gpi); gsi_next (&gpi))
> +    {
> +      gphi *phi = gpi.phi ();
> +      tree e_arg = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, e);
> +      tree latch_arg = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, latch_exit);
> +
> +      if (!operand_equal_p (e_arg, latch_arg, 0))
> +     return false;
> +    }
> +
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return a constrained latch bound for LATCH_EXIT, using only exits that
> +   dominate LATCH_EXIT and are executed once per iteration.  The original
> +   latch count is stored in *LATCH_NITER_OUT.  */
> +
> +static tree
> +find_latch_constrained_niter (class loop *loop, edge latch_exit,
> +                           tree *latch_niter_out)
> +{
> +  class tree_niter_desc desc;
> +
> +  *latch_niter_out = NULL_TREE;
> +  if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, latch_exit, &desc, false)
> +      || !integer_zerop (desc.may_be_zero))
> +    return chrec_dont_know;
> +
> +  tree niter = desc.niter;
> +  *latch_niter_out = niter;
> +
> +  for (auto e : get_loop_exit_edges (loop))
> +    {
> +      /* Ignore the latch edge, and the exit must dominate the latch.  If it
> +      doesn't then the form is broken.  */
> +      if (e == latch_exit
> +       || !just_once_each_iteration_p (loop, e->src)
> +       || !dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, latch_exit->src, e->src))
> +     continue;
> +
> +      /* The edge must have a non-zero iteration count.  */
> +      if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, e, &desc, false)
> +       || !integer_zerop (desc.may_be_zero))
> +     continue;
> +
> +      tree aniter = desc.niter;
> +      tree ty1 = TREE_TYPE (niter);
> +      tree ty2 = TREE_TYPE (aniter);
> +      if (ty1 != ty2)
> +     {
> +       if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (ty1) != TYPE_UNSIGNED (ty2))
> +         return chrec_dont_know;
> +
> +       if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (niter)
> +           && TYPE_PRECISION (ty1) <= TYPE_PRECISION (ty2))
> +         niter = fold_convert (ty2, niter);
> +       else if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (aniter)
> +                && TYPE_PRECISION (ty2) <= TYPE_PRECISION (ty1))
> +         aniter = fold_convert (ty1, aniter);
> +       else
> +         return chrec_dont_know;
> +     }
> +
> +      if (TREE_CODE (aniter) != INTEGER_CST)
> +     continue;
> +
> +      if (TREE_CODE (niter) != INTEGER_CST)
> +     {
> +       niter = fold_build2 (MIN_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (niter), niter, aniter);
> +       continue;
> +     }
> +
> +      niter = tree_int_cst_lt (aniter, niter) ? aniter : niter;
> +    }
> +
> +  return niter;
> +}
> +
>  /* Describe size of loop as detected by tree_estimate_loop_size.  */
>  struct loop_size
>  {
> @@ -766,7 +893,7 @@ try_unroll_loop_completely (class loop *loop,
>       If the number of execution of loop is determined by standard induction
>       variable test, then EXIT and EDGE_TO_CANCEL are the two edges leaving
>       from the iv test.  */
> -  if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (niter))
> +  if (exit && tree_fits_uhwi_p (niter))
>      {
>        n_unroll = tree_to_uhwi (niter);
>        n_unroll_found = true;
> @@ -1354,7 +1481,77 @@ canonicalize_loop_induction_variables (class loop 
> *loop,
>                                 innermost_cunrolli_p))
>      return true;
>  
> -  if ((create_iv || by_eval)
> +  edge latch_e = NULL;
> +  bool aggr_rewritten_p = false;
> +  if (create_iv && !single_exit (loop))
> +    {
> +      tree latch_niter = NULL_TREE;
> +      tree niter_aggr = chrec_dont_know;
> +
> +      latch_e = loop_latch_edge (loop);
> +      if (single_pred_p (latch_e->src))
> +     {
> +       latch_e = single_pred_edge (latch_e->src);
> +       auto bb_exit = latch_e->src;
> +       if (EDGE_COUNT (bb_exit->succs) != 2)
> +         latch_e = NULL;
> +       else if (loop_exit_edge_p (loop, EDGE_SUCC (bb_exit, 0)))
> +         latch_e = EDGE_SUCC (bb_exit, 0);
> +       else if (loop_exit_edge_p (loop, EDGE_SUCC (bb_exit, 1)))
> +         latch_e = EDGE_SUCC (bb_exit, 1);
> +       else
> +         latch_e = NULL;
> +     }
> +      else
> +     latch_e = NULL;
> +
> +      if (latch_e)
> +     {
> +       niter_aggr = find_latch_constrained_niter (loop, latch_e,
> +                                                  &latch_niter);
> +       if (!niter_aggr)
> +         niter_aggr = chrec_dont_know;
> +       if (chrec_contains_undetermined (latch_niter)
> +           || chrec_contains_undetermined (niter_aggr)
> +           || operand_equal_p (latch_niter, niter_aggr, 0))
> +         latch_e = NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +      if (latch_e)
> +     {
> +       create_canonical_iv (loop, latch_e, niter_aggr);
> +       aggr_rewritten_p = true;
> +
> +       for (auto e : get_loop_exit_edges (loop))
> +         if (redundant_with_constrained_latch_exit_p (loop, e, latch_e,
> +                                                      maxiter))
> +           {
> +             gcond *cond_stmt
> +               = as_a <gcond *> (gsi_stmt (gsi_last_nondebug_bb
> +                                           (e->src)));
> +             if (e->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE)
> +               gimple_cond_make_false (cond_stmt);
> +             else
> +               gimple_cond_make_true (cond_stmt);
> +             update_stmt (cond_stmt);
> +           }
> +
> +       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +         {
> +           fprintf (dump_file,
> +                    "Loop %d exit edges updated and IV rewritten to ",
> +                    loop->num);
> +           print_generic_expr (dump_file, niter_aggr, TDF_SLIM);
> +           fprintf (dump_file, ".\n");
> +         }
> +     }
> +    }
> +
> +  /* Only accept the new MIN based bounds if we can actually simplify the 
> loop,
> +     otherwise the MIN_EXPR just causes more instruction in loop pre-headers
> +     without any benefits.  */
> +  if (!aggr_rewritten_p
> +      && (create_iv || by_eval)
>        && niter && !chrec_contains_undetermined (niter)
>        && exit && just_once_each_iteration_p (loop, exit->src))
>      {
> @@ -1798,5 +1995,3 @@ make_pass_complete_unrolli (gcc::context *ctxt)
>  {
>    return new pass_complete_unrolli (ctxt);
>  }
> -
> -
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <[email protected]>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to