The fixes that affect gcc/cobol/ and libgcobol/ files look good to me.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2026 05:43 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [PATCH 00/42] Fix (many) typos, part 1 > > From: Dhruv Chawla <[email protected]> > > This patch series is a comb through the GCC codebase to try and > eliminate as many source-level typos as I could find. I have tried to > roughly organize it component-wise to make it easier to review. I also > split up the gcc/ directory into 4 patches, with roughly 100 changes > in each patch. > > This first series fixes typos in target-independent files, with backend > changes being part of a separate series that will form part 2. > > I have not modified testsuite or generated sources, and would appreciate > help on which files I need to regenerate based on the build files that have > been modified. I have also tried to avoid modifying externally developed > projects like the go/rust frontends. > > I would like an explicit OK on these patches as they contain a very > large number of changes. I would like to land these within the next few > days as rebasing can be time-consuming. > > This would not have been possible without the help of the codespell tool > (https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell), whose replacement > suggestions formed the foundation of this work. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu. >
