On Wed, 20 May 2026 at 14:09, David Malcolm <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jonathan: is it OK if I push this? (and further such similar changes). > It introduces an extra level of coupling in the test results between the > libstdc++ headers, the optimizer, and the analyzer: changes to any of > these three could lead to test failures. Arguably this is a good thing, > but I wanted to give you a "heads up" about it.
The coupling seems fine to me, you're only relying on the public API, and arguably if we do change some libstdc++ internals in a way that breaks the analyzer, it would be good to know about that.
