On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 6:32 PM Hewill Kang <[email protected]> wrote:
> This also allows:
>
> std::array<int, 4> a;
> std::simd::vec v{std::ranges::ref_view(a)};
>
> But I don't think users will complain about this.
> For library authors, is it unacceptable to have beneficial enhancements
> that don't fully conform to the standards? hum.
>
Incompatibilities and non-portable code are not beneficial enhancements in
any way.
Rejecting code with UB would fine, a difference in signature is bad.
Not opposed to having this again if the committee votes on it, and all
implementations
will converge at some point.
