Hi!

The following testcase ICEs, because combine matches
(set (reg:DI 108) (plus:DI (reg:DI 104 [ s ]) (subreg:DI (reg:TI 103 [ _2 ]) 
8)))
Now, because ix86_validate_address_register has:
12038         /* Don't allow SUBREGs that span more than a word.  It can
12039            lead to spill failures when the register is one word out
12040            of a two word structure.  */
12041         if (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) > UNITS_PER_WORD)
12042           return NULL_RTX;
this isn't recognized as *leadi, but is recognized as *adddi_1_nf pattern
instead.  Now, later on the RA turns it into:
(set (reg:DI 2 cx [108]) (plus:DI (reg:DI 0 ax [orig:104 s ] [104]) (reg:DI 5 
di [ _2+8 ])))
which would be valid *leadi, but given that INSN_CODE is already set to the
*adddi_1_nf and that also satisfies it, nothing re-recognizes it as *leadi.
But in that case without TARGET_APX_NDD the pattern has return "#";
That is a bug, because there is no splitter to split that
(set (reg:DI 2 cx [108]) (plus:DI (reg:DI 0 ax [orig:104 s ] [104]) (reg:DI 5 
di [ _2+8 ])))
into itself so that it is re-recognized as *leadi, so it just ICEs.
I think having a splitter to split to the same thing would be just weird, so
this just outputs lea insn directly.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/16/15?

2026-05-28  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>

        PR target/125469
        * config/i386/i386.md (*add<mode>_1<nf_name>): Don't return "#" for
        the lea non-TARGET_APX_NDD case, instead emit a lea directly.

        * gcc.target/i386/apx-nf-pr125469.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj  2026-05-20 14:05:56.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md     2026-05-27 18:12:47.265960379 +0200
@@ -6749,7 +6749,10 @@ (define_insn "*add<mode>_1<nf_name>"
       if (TARGET_APX_NDD && <nf_applied>)
        return "%{nf%} add{<imodesuffix>}\t{%2, %1, %0|%0, %1, %2}";
       else
-       return "#";
+       {
+         operands[3] = gen_rtx_PLUS (<MODE>mode, operands[1], operands[2]);
+         return "lea{<imodesuffix>}\t{%E3, %0|%0, %E3}";
+       }
 
     case TYPE_INCDEC:
       if (operands[2] == const1_rtx)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-nf-pr125469.c.jj  2026-05-27 
18:29:26.227640333 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-nf-pr125469.c     2026-05-27 
18:28:58.745979258 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR target/125469 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast -mapx-features=nf" } */
+
+int s;
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+  s /= ((__int128) 0x33333333333333333333333333333333uwb) + 1i;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to