From: Dhruv Chawla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dhruv Chawla <[email protected]>
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rx/rx.cc (rx_print_operand): Fix typos.
(rx_expand_epilogue): Likewise.
* config/rx/rx.md: Likewise.
---
gcc/config/rx/rx.cc | 4 ++--
gcc/config/rx/rx.md | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rx/rx.cc b/gcc/config/rx/rx.cc
index 4078580f6ad..038f93431f4 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rx/rx.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rx/rx.cc
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ rx_print_operand (FILE * file, rtx op, int letter)
rtx base = XEXP (op, 0);
rtx index = XEXP (op, 1);
- /* Check for a swaped index register and scaling factor.
+ /* Check for a swapped index register and scaling factor.
Not sure if this can happen, but be prepared to handle it. */
if (CONST_INT_P (base) && REG_P (index))
{
@@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ rx_expand_epilogue (bool is_sibcall)
unsigned int reg;
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT total_size;
- /* FIXME: We do not support indirect sibcalls at the moment becaause we
+ /* FIXME: We do not support indirect sibcalls at the moment because we
cannot guarantee that the register holding the function address is a
call-used register. If it is a call-saved register then the stack
pop instructions generated in the epilogue will corrupt the address
diff --git a/gcc/config/rx/rx.md b/gcc/config/rx/rx.md
index b3398ab9fc5..1bd80fd3e2e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rx/rx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rx/rx.md
@@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@
;; combiner bridge patterns. Especially when the memory operands have a
;; displacement, the resulting patterns look too complex.
;; Instead we manually look around the matched insn to see if there is a
-;; preceeding memory load and a following memory store of the modified register
+;; preceding memory load and a following memory store of the modified register
;; which can be fused into the single *_in_memory insn.
;; Do that before register allocation, as it can eliminate one temporary
;; register that needs to be allocated.
--
2.43.0
