From: Claudio Bantaloukas <[email protected]>

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def (cortex-a320): Update core.
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc: Add cortexa320.h.
        * config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h: New file.
---
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def          |   2 +-
 gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc                 |   1 +
 gcc/config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h | 195 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
index 2cae1a38a87d..0fce3204d1eb 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-cores.def
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a720",  cortexa720, cortexa57, V9_2A,  
(SVE2_BITPERM, MEMTA
 AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a720ae",  cortexa720ae, cortexa57, V9_2A,  (SVE2_BITPERM, 
MEMTAG, PROFILE), neoversen2, 0x41, 0xd89, -1)
 AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a725",  cortexa725, cortexa57, V9_2A, (SVE2_BITPERM, 
MEMTAG, PROFILE), neoversen3, 0x41, 0xd87, -1)
 
-AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a320", cortexa320, cortexa53, V9_2A, (SVE2_BITPERM, 
MEMTAG), cortexa53, 0x41, 0xd8f, -1)
+AARCH64_CORE("cortex-a320", cortexa320, cortexa53, V9_2A, (SVE2_BITPERM, 
MEMTAG), cortexa320, 0x41, 0xd8f, -1)
 
 AARCH64_CORE("cortex-x2",  cortexx2, cortexa57, V9A,  (SVE2_BITPERM, MEMTAG, 
I8MM, BF16), neoversen2, 0x41, 0xd48, -1)
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 69530ea9d347..08746b657746 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ static const struct aarch64_flag_desc 
aarch64_tuning_flags[] =
 #include "tuning_models/generic.h"
 #include "tuning_models/generic_armv8_a.h"
 #include "tuning_models/generic_armv9_a.h"
+#include "tuning_models/cortexa320.h"
 #include "tuning_models/cortexa35.h"
 #include "tuning_models/cortexa53.h"
 #include "tuning_models/cortexa57.h"
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2bd46a20da82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/tuning_models/cortexa320.h
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+/* Tuning model description for AArch64 architecture.
+   Copyright (C) 2009-2026 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This file is part of GCC.
+
+   GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+   under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
+   any later version.
+
+   GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+   WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
+   General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
+   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#ifndef GCC_AARCH64_H_CORTEXA320
+#define GCC_AARCH64_H_CORTEXA320
+
+#include "generic.h"
+
+static const struct cpu_addrcost_table cortexa320_addrcost_table =
+{
+    {
+      1, /* hi  */
+      0, /* si  */
+      0, /* di  */
+      1, /* ti  */
+    },
+  0, /* pre_modify  */
+  0, /* post_modify  */
+  2, /* post_modify_ld3_st3  */
+  2, /* post_modify_ld4_st4  */
+  0, /* register_offset  */
+  0, /* register_sextend  */
+  0, /* register_zextend  */
+  0 /* imm_offset  */
+};
+
+static const struct cpu_regmove_cost cortexa320_regmove_cost =
+{
+  5, /* GP2GP  */
+  /* Spilling to int<->fp instead of memory is recommended so set
+     realistic costs compared to memmov_cost.  */
+  7, /* GP2FP  */
+  7, /* FP2GP  */
+  7 /* FP2FP  */
+};
+
+static const advsimd_vec_cost cortexa320_advsimd_vector_cost =
+{
+  3, /* int_stmt_cost  */
+  4, /* fp_stmt_cost  */
+  1, /* ld2_st2_permute_cost */
+  2, /* ld3_st3_permute_cost  */
+  3, /* ld4_st4_permute_cost  */
+  3, /* permute_cost  */
+  3, /* reduc_i8_cost  */
+  4, /* reduc_i16_cost  */
+  4, /* reduc_i32_cost  */
+  3, /* reduc_i64_cost  */
+  12, /* reduc_f16_cost  */
+  8, /* reduc_f32_cost  */
+  4, /* reduc_f64_cost  */
+  0, /* store_elt_extra_cost  */
+  /* This value is just inherited from the Cortex-A57 table.  */
+  8, /* vec_to_scalar_cost  */
+  /* This depends very much on what the scalar value is and
+     where it comes from.  E.g. some constants take two dependent
+     instructions or a load, while others might be moved from a GPR.
+     4 seems to be a reasonable compromise in practice.  */
+  4, /* scalar_to_vec_cost  */
+  5, /* align_load_cost  */
+  5, /* unalign_load_cost  */
+  /* Although stores have a latency of 2 and compete for the
+     vector pipes, in practice it's better not to model that.  */
+  2, /* unalign_store_cost  */
+  2  /* store_cost  */
+};
+
+static const sve_vec_cost cortexa320_sve_vector_cost =
+{
+  {
+    3, /* int_stmt_cost  */
+    4, /* fp_stmt_cost  */
+    1, /* ld2_st2_permute_cost  */
+    2, /* ld3_st3_permute_cost  */
+    3, /* ld4_st4_permute_cost  */
+    3, /* permute_cost  */
+    /* Theoretically, a reduction involving 15 scalar ADDs could
+       complete in ~15 cycles and would have a cost of 15.  [SU]ADDV
+       completes in 4 cycles, so give it a cost of 15 + -11.  */
+    4, /* reduc_i8_cost  */
+    /* Likewise for 7 scalar ADDs (~7 cycles) vs. 4: 7 + -3.  */
+    4, /* reduc_i16_cost  */
+    /* Likewise for 3 scalar ADDs (~3 cycles) vs. 4: 3 + 1.  */
+    4, /* reduc_i32_cost  */
+    /* Likewise for 1 scalar ADD (~1 cycles) vs. 4: 1 + 3.  */
+    4, /* reduc_i64_cost  */
+    /* Theoretically, a reduction involving 7 scalar FADDs could
+       complete in ~28 cycles and would have a cost of  28.  FADDV
+       completes in 12 cycles, so give it a cost of 28 + -16.  */
+    12, /* reduc_f16_cost  */
+    /* Likewise for 3 scalar FADDs (~12 cycles) vs. 8: 12 + -4.  */
+    8, /* reduc_f32_cost  */
+    /* Likewise for 1 scalar FADD (~4 cycles) vs. 4: 4 + 0.  */
+    4, /* reduc_f64_cost  */
+    0, /* store_elt_extra_cost  */
+    /* This value is just inherited from the Cortex-A57 table.  */
+    8, /* vec_to_scalar_cost  */
+    /* See the comment above the Advanced SIMD versions.  */
+    4, /* scalar_to_vec_cost  */
+    5, /* align_load_cost  */
+    5, /* unalign_load_cost  */
+    /* Although stores have a latency of 2 and compete for the
+       vector pipes, in practice it's better not to model that.  */
+    2, /* unalign_store_cost  */
+    2  /* store_cost  */
+  },
+  4, /* clast_cost  */
+  25, /* fadda_f16_cost  */
+  9, /* fadda_f32_cost  */
+  3, /* fadda_f64_cost  */
+  /* A strided Advanced SIMD x64 load would take two parallel FP loads
+     (10 cycles) plus an insertion (3 cycles).  Assume a 64-bit SVE gather
+     is 1 cycle more.  The Advanced SIMD version is costed as 2 scalar loads
+     (cost 10) and a vec_construct (cost 3).  Add a full vector operation
+     (cost 3) to that, to avoid the difference being lost in rounding.
+
+     There is no easy comparison between a strided Advanced SIMD x32 load
+     and an SVE 32-bit gather, but cost an SVE 32-bit gather as 1 vector
+     operation more than a 64-bit gather.  */
+  16, /* gather_load_x32_cost  */
+  19, /* gather_load_x64_cost  */
+  48, /* gather_load_x32_init_cost  */
+  38, /* gather_load_x64_init_cost  */
+  0 /* scatter_store_elt_cost  */
+};
+
+/* Cortexa320 costs for vector insn classes.  */
+static const struct cpu_vector_cost cortexa320_vector_cost =
+{
+  1, /* scalar_int_stmt_cost  */
+  2, /* scalar_fp_stmt_cost  */
+  4, /* scalar_load_cost  */
+  1, /* scalar_store_cost  */
+  1, /* cond_taken_branch_cost  */
+  1, /* cond_not_taken_branch_cost  */
+  &cortexa320_advsimd_vector_cost, /* advsimd  */
+  &cortexa320_sve_vector_cost, /* sve  */
+  nullptr /* issue_info  */
+};
+
+static const struct tune_params cortexa320_tunings =
+{
+  &cortexa76_extra_costs,
+  &cortexa320_addrcost_table,
+  &cortexa320_regmove_cost,
+  &cortexa320_vector_cost,
+  &generic_branch_cost,
+  &generic_approx_modes,
+  SVE_128, /* sve_width  */
+  { 4, /* load_int.  */
+    1, /* store_int.  */
+    5, /* load_fp.  */
+    2, /* store_fp.  */
+    4, /* load_pred.  */
+    1 /* store_pred.  */
+  }, /* memmov_cost.  */
+  1, /* issue_rate  */
+  AARCH64_FUSE_NEOVERSE_BASE, /* fusible_ops  */
+  "32:16",     /* function_align.  */
+  "4",         /* jump_align.  */
+  "32:16",     /* loop_align.  */
+  1,   /* int_reassoc_width.  */
+  1,   /* fp_reassoc_width.  */
+  1,   /* fma_reassoc_width.  */
+  1,   /* vec_reassoc_width.  */
+  2,   /* min_div_recip_mul_sf.  */
+  2,   /* min_div_recip_mul_df.  */
+  0,   /* max_case_values.  */
+  tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK,    /* autoprefetcher_model.  */
+  (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND
+   | AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS
+   | AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_MATCHED_VECTOR_THROUGHPUT),    /* tune_flags.  */
+  &generic_armv9a_prefetch_tune,
+  AARCH64_LDP_STP_POLICY_ALWAYS,   /* ldp_policy_model.  */
+  AARCH64_LDP_STP_POLICY_ALWAYS,   /* stp_policy_model.  */
+  nullptr      /* dispatch_constraints.  */
+};
+
+#endif /* GCC_AARCH64_H_CORTEXA320.  */
-- 
2.54.0

Reply via email to