> Hello, > > I think this needs a test case that demonstrates why this change is > necessary. Something that shows the miscompile with alias analysis > enabled.
That would be nice, but I don't think it is absolutely necessary considering the purpose of this change is to err on the side of caution, until we clarify if/how the Algol 68 type system can benefit from strict aliasing optimizations. > > Thanks, > Shivam > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 at 17:59, Kanishka Solanki < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Following review feedback, this version adds the requested commit >> subject prefix and an explanatory comment before the return statement >> in a68_get_alias_set. >> >> The frontend builds successfully and make check-algol68 passes with this >> change. >> >> Thanks, >> Kanishka Solanki >> >>
