On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 at 12:25, Andrea Pinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not implement the opposite flow in say widenning_multiply when the > target does not have a widening multiply? > This will allow for when someone say just wrote > ((__int128)long_var1)*((__int128)long_var2) in the first place. > and then canonical form during gimple is one thing?
ACK. > Thanks, > Andrea
