On 6/24/26 11:18 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry, Paul,
Am 23.06.26 um 9:28 PM schrieb Jerry D:
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9579e3eb64ec89c4c0781bb0a59409f15c997213
commit r17-1786-g9579e3eb64ec89c4c0781bb0a59409f15c997213
Author: Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Jun 19 14:54:00 2026 -0700
The fix for the leak in pdt_82.f03
[...]
I'd rather leave the review to Paul, but I have one question:
As is, the new helper has_class_alloc_comp might return true for
pointer components, but I think it should not.
Can you please check?
Harald, I think you are right. I changed it to this:
static bool
has_class_alloc_comp (gfc_symbol *der)
{
for (gfc_component *c = der->components; c; c = c->next)
if (c->ts.type == BT_CLASS && !c->attr.pointer)
return true;
return false;
}
This should have been attr.class_pointer, the above does
not do what you think. But given Paul's comment, it is
not relevant.
I have made this change, complete fresh rebuild, and regression tested.
Pushed as:
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:039e2254d55e5d53f2766ead3495413b4788e00c
commit r17-1909-g039e2254d55e5d53f2766ead3495413b4788e00c
Author: Jerry DeLisle <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Jun 25 20:54:48 2026 -0700
Jerry --
