Jiahao Xu <[email protected]> writes: > Follow up to r17-1827-g92d206fab98, which changed the reassociation_width > target hook to use tree_code instead of unsigned int. This patch updates > loongarch_sched_reassociation_width to use the correct tree_code parameter > type to match the target hook definition. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_sched_reassociation_width): > Get a tree_code instead of unsigned int. > --- > gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > index 1192c85e0f1..3f0666f360c 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc > @@ -10038,7 +10038,7 @@ loongarch_cpu_sched_reassociation_width (struct > loongarch_target *target, > /* Implement TARGET_SCHED_REASSOCIATION_WIDTH. */ > > static int > -loongarch_sched_reassociation_width (unsigned int opc, machine_mode mode) > +loongarch_sched_reassociation_width (tree_code opc, machine_mode mode) > { > return loongarch_cpu_sched_reassociation_width (&la_target, opc, mode); > }
Pushed as r17-1911. Thanks.
