Made changes according to Jason's Merrill comments.
From 9a42e71cd2244b80327cb37fe372c45b018b5958 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Semykin <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 13:25:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v4] cp: fix unevaluated operand context for typeid [PR
 c++/125886]

Per [expr.typeid]/4-5, a typeid operand is unevaluated by default and
is evaluated only for a glvalue of polymorphic class type whose dynamic
type is not known at compile time.  Previously GCC always parsed the
operand in an evaluated context, which broke unevaluated uses (declval,
non-static data members per DR613, function parameters) and missed
lambda capture diagnostics for evaluated polymorphic operands.

Implement a two-pass parse: first under cp_unevaluated, then - if
typeid_evaluated_p says the operand is evaluated - roll back and
re-parse under cp_evaluated.  Share the evaluated/unevaluated predicate
via typeid_evaluated_p in rtti.cc, used from the parser, tsubst_expr,
and build_typeid.

Also fixes PR c++/68604 and PR c++/116385, and removes a now-stale xfail
in g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C.

Changes since v1:
- Apply the same two-pass logic to template-dependent operands in
  tsubst_expr (TYPEID_EXPR), as Jason requested.
- Fix lambda capture: a polymorphic glvalue typeid operand inside a
  lambda without a capture-default is now correctly diagnosed as
  "not captured".  Root cause was typeid_evaluated_p rejecting
  reference types and being gated on the "nonnull" flag, which is
  unrelated to the evaluated/unevaluated decision.
- Factor the polymorphic-glvalue predicate into shared typeid_evaluated_p
  used by the parser, tsubst, and build_typeid.
- Drop the cxx_dialect >= cxx11 gate: per Jason, DR613 applies in all
  modes, since finish_non_static_data_member doesn't check cxx_dialect
  either.

Changes since v2:
- Restored the full commit message (rationale + ChangeLog entries).
- Shortened cp_unevaluated_operand comments in cp-tree.h and parser.cc
  (git gcc-style).
- Fixed indentation in parser.cc and rtti.cc (git gcc-style).
- Use cp_unevaluated RAII in cp_parser_postfix_expression instead of
  manual ++/--cp_unevaluated_operand, matching tsubst_expr.
- Kept glvalue_p in typeid_evaluated_p: [expr.typeid]/4 applies only to
  a glvalue of polymorphic class type; a polymorphic class prvalue can
  have resolves_to_fixed_type_p false yet still be unevaluated (see
  "Not a glvalue" in g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-typeid2.C).  Without
  glvalue_p that case would incorrectly take the evaluated re-parse
  path.
- Investigated the g++.dg/modules/compile-std1.C failure Jason flagged
  as surprising (reproduced with
  'make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="modules.exp=compile-std1.C"').
  g++.log shows cc1plus: fatal error: bits/std.cc: No such file or directory
  and the same for bits/std.compat.cc under --compile-std-module; import
  std then fails because gcm.cache/std.gcm was never built.  Here the
  libstdc++ symlinks at .../include/bits/std.{,compat.}cc point at
  src/c++23/std.{,compat.}cc, but those generated files are missing
  (only .in templates remain) - incomplete libstdc++ modules build, not
  a cp/typeid regression.  Unrelated to this patch.

Changes since v3:
- Removed cp_evaluated on the re-parse path in both
  cp_parser_postfix_expression and tsubst_expr.  As Jason pointed
  out, the re-parse should not override the typeid itself being
  within an outer unevaluated operand (e.g. sizeof (typeid (b)));
  it should just drop back to whatever context enclosed it.
- Added a comment on the glvalue_p check in typeid_evaluated_p
  noting it's only needed because resolves_to_fixed_type_p doesn't
  handle all prvalue cases (e.g. COMPOUND_EXPR), per Jason's
  observation.
- Removed a stale test (lambda_sizeof_typeid) that encoded the old,
  incorrect behavior (requiring capture for typeid nested inside
  sizeof); added nested_unevaluated and nested_unevaluated_lambda
  to cover the corrected behavior instead.

Tested full CI on: x86_64 GNU/Linux 6.17.0-35-generic Ubuntu 24.04.
The following failures are pre-existing on trunk without this patch
and are unrelated to the changes here (full log via
'make -C gcc -k check-c++-all' attached):

FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/flex-without-call-summaries.c -std=c++11
  at line 885 (test for warnings, line 884)
XPASS: c-c++-common/analyzer/flex-without-call-summaries.c -std=c++11
  PR analyzer/103546 (test for bogus messages, line 892)
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/flex-without-call-summaries.c -std=c++11
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
  -flto-partition=none line 23 p == 40
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/compile-std1.C -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-8.C -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_c.C -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-7_a.H -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_a.H -std=c++26 -fimplicit-constexpr
  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/plugin/std-module-exports-c++20.C
  -fplugin=./std_module_exports_plugin.so (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/plugin/std-module-exports-c++23.C
  -fplugin=./std_module_exports_plugin.so (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/plugin/std-module-exports-c++26.C
  -fplugin=./std_module_exports_plugin.so (test for excess errors)

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
	PR c++/125886
	* parser.cc (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Two-pass typeid parse.
	* pt.cc (tsubst_expr): Same for TYPEID_EXPR.
	* rtti.cc (typeid_evaluated_p, build_typeid): Shared predicate.
	* cp-tree.h: Declare typeid_evaluated_p.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C, g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C: New tests.
	* g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C: Drop stale xfail.

Signed-off-by: Vladislav Semykin <[email protected]>
---
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  1 +
 gcc/cp/parser.cc                              | 26 +++++-
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 17 +++-
 gcc/cp/rtti.cc                                | 48 ++++++++---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C |  3 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C         | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C          | 19 +++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C          | 23 ++++++
 8 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index 132139f9d..df0f253cc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -7486,6 +7486,7 @@ extern tree current_nonlambda_class_type	(void);
 extern tree finish_struct			(tree, tree);
 extern void finish_struct_1			(tree);
 extern int resolves_to_fixed_type_p		(tree, int * = NULL);
+extern bool typeid_evaluated_p (tree);
 extern void init_class_processing		(void);
 extern int is_empty_class			(tree);
 extern bool is_really_empty_class		(tree, bool);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 8194106c6..5bb434903 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -292,7 +292,8 @@ static void missing_template_diag
 static FILE *cp_lexer_debug_stream;
 
 /* Nonzero if we are parsing an unevaluated operand: an operand to
-   sizeof, typeof, or alignof.  */
+   sizeof, typeof, or alignof.  This is a count since operands to
+   sizeof can be nested.  */
 int cp_unevaluated_operand;
 
 /* Nonzero if we are parsing a reflect-expression and shouldn't strip
@@ -8570,9 +8571,28 @@ cp_parser_postfix_expression (cp_parser *parser, bool address_p, bool cast_p,
 	else
 	  {
 	    tree expression;
+	    /* [expr.typeid]/4-5: parse the operand unevaluated first; if it is
+	       a polymorphic glvalue, roll back and re-parse it evaluated,
+	       since an evaluated parse has irreversible side-effects
+	       (mark_used -> instantiation; lambda capture).  */
+	    cp_lexer_save_tokens (parser->lexer);
+	    {
+	      cp_unevaluated u;
+	      expression = cp_parser_expression (parser, &idk);
+	    }
+	    if (expression != error_mark_node
+		&& processing_template_decl == 0
+		&& typeid_evaluated_p (expression))
+	      {
+		/* Re-parse the operand evaluated so the /4 side-effects occur.
+		   The unevaluated pass above called no mark_used and captured
+		   nothing, so rolling back has nothing to undo.  */
+		cp_lexer_rollback_tokens (parser->lexer);
+		expression = cp_parser_expression (parser, &idk);
+	      }
+	    else
+	      cp_lexer_commit_tokens (parser->lexer);
 
-	    /* Look for an expression.  */
-	    expression = cp_parser_expression (parser, & idk);
 	    /* Compute its typeid.  */
 	    postfix_expression = build_typeid (expression, tf_warning_or_error);
 	    /* Look for the `)' token.  */
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index f7aa10226..40ec4d800 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -23003,8 +23003,21 @@ tsubst_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl)
 	  }
 	else
 	  {
-	    operand_0 = RECUR (operand_0);
-	    RETURN (build_typeid (operand_0, complain));
+	    /* [expr.typeid]/4-5: substitute the operand unevaluated first, then
+	       again evaluated if it is a polymorphic glvalue, so the /4
+	       side-effects occur.  The unevaluated pass instantiates nothing,
+	       so re-substituting has nothing to undo (PR c++/125886).  */
+	    tree operand;
+	    tree uneval;
+	      {
+		cp_unevaluated u;
+		uneval = RECUR (operand_0);
+	      }
+	    if (typeid_evaluated_p (uneval))
+	      operand = RECUR (operand_0);
+	    else
+	      operand = uneval;
+	    RETURN (build_typeid (operand, complain));
 	  }
       }
 
diff --git a/gcc/cp/rtti.cc b/gcc/cp/rtti.cc
index 7e6fa5193..bb38758c0 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/rtti.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/rtti.cc
@@ -340,6 +340,32 @@ typeid_ok_p (void)
   return true;
 }
 
+/* True if EXP is a glvalue expression of polymorphic class type whose
+   dynamic type is not known statically, so that typeid (EXP) must be
+   evaluated per ([expr.typeid]/4).  */
+
+bool
+typeid_evaluated_p (tree exp)
+{
+  if (exp == error_mark_node)
+    return false;
+  tree t = TREE_TYPE (exp);
+  if (!t || t == error_mark_node)
+    return false;
+  if (TYPE_REF_P (t))
+    t = TREE_TYPE (t);
+  if (TREE_CODE (t) != RECORD_TYPE && TREE_CODE (t) != UNION_TYPE)
+    return false;
+  int nonnull = 0;
+  return (TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (t)
+	  && !resolves_to_fixed_type_p (exp, &nonnull)
+    /* Only a glvalue operand is evaluated ([expr.typeid]/4).
+       The following check is only necessary because
+       resolves_to_fixed_type_p does not handle all
+       prvalue cases such as COMPOUND_EXPR.  */
+	  && glvalue_p (exp));
+}
+
 /* Return an expression for "typeid(EXP)".  The expression returned is
    an lvalue of type "const std::type_info".  */
 
@@ -347,7 +373,6 @@ tree
 build_typeid (tree exp, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 {
   tree cond = NULL_TREE, initial_expr = exp;
-  int nonnull = 0;
 
   if (exp == error_mark_node || !typeid_ok_p ())
     return error_mark_node;
@@ -355,17 +380,18 @@ build_typeid (tree exp, tsubst_flags_t complain)
   if (processing_template_decl)
     return build_min (TYPEID_EXPR, const_type_info_type_node, exp);
 
-  if (CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (exp))
-      && TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (TREE_TYPE (exp))
-      && ! resolves_to_fixed_type_p (exp, &nonnull)
-      && ! nonnull)
+  if (typeid_evaluated_p (exp))
     {
-      /* So we need to look into the vtable of the type of exp.
-         Make sure it isn't a null lvalue.  */
-      exp = cp_build_addr_expr (exp, complain);
-      exp = save_expr (exp);
-      cond = cp_convert (boolean_type_node, exp, complain);
-      exp = cp_build_fold_indirect_ref (exp);
+      int nonnull = 0;
+      resolves_to_fixed_type_p (exp, &nonnull);
+      if (!nonnull)
+	{
+	  /* Make sure it isn't a null lvalue; evaluate it once.  */
+	  exp = cp_build_addr_expr (exp, complain);
+	  exp = save_expr (exp);
+	  cond = cp_convert (boolean_type_node, exp, complain);
+	  exp = cp_build_fold_indirect_ref (exp);
+	}
     }
 
   exp = get_tinfo_ptr_dynamic (exp, complain);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C
index 63dae38de..f763b208c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/unevaluated.C
@@ -17,8 +17,7 @@ struct Task {
 // We do not permit co_await, co_yield outside a function, and so uses in
 // noexcept or requirements are covered by that.
 Task foo()  {
-    /* This one will currently fail - see PR68604.  */
-    const std::type_info& ti1 = typeid (co_await std::suspend_never{}); // { dg-error {'co_await' cannot be used in an unevaluated context} "" { xfail *-*-* } }
+    const std::type_info& ti1 = typeid (co_await std::suspend_never{}); // { dg-error {'co_await' cannot be used in an unevaluated context} }
     std::size_t x = sizeof (co_yield (19)); // { dg-error {'co_yield' cannot be used in an unevaluated context} }
     decltype (co_await std::suspend_never{}) A; // { dg-error {'co_await' cannot be used in an unevaluated context} }
     co_return;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..96a7ec3cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr125886.C
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+// PR c++/125886
+// PR c++/68604
+// PR c++/116385
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#include <typeinfo>
+#include <utility>
+
+// PR c++/125886: a non-polymorphic operand is an unevaluated operand
+// ([expr.typeid]/5), so std::declval<A>() is not instantiated and its
+// static_assert does not fire.
+struct A {};
+void
+non_poly_declval ()
+{
+  (void) typeid (std::declval<A> ());
+}
+
+// PR c++/125886 (template): the evaluated/unevaluated decision is taken
+// at instantiation time in tsubst; a non-polymorphic operand is
+// unevaluated, so tmpl<A> is well-formed.
+template <typename T>
+void
+tmpl ()
+{
+  (void) typeid (std::declval<T> ());
+}
+
+template void tmpl<A> ();
+
+// PR c++/68604: an id-expression denoting a non-static data member is
+// valid in an unevaluated operand (DR613 / N2253, C++11+).
+struct C { int i; };
+void
+nsm ()
+{
+  (void) typeid (C::i);
+}
+
+// PR c++/116385: function parameters are not odr-used in an unevaluated
+// typeid operand, so they need not be captured and may appear in local
+// classes and default arguments.
+void
+params (int n)
+{
+  [&] { (void) typeid (n); };
+  struct Local { void g () { (void) typeid (n); } };
+  void g (const std::type_info& = typeid (n));
+}
+
+// A final-class polymorphic glvalue resolves to a fixed (static) type,
+// so typeid is unevaluated: no vtable lookup, no odr-use.
+struct F final { virtual ~F (); };
+void
+final_glvalue (F& f)
+{
+  (void) typeid (f);
+}
+
+// Polymorphic glvalue in lambda without capture-default must be captured,
+// since typeid is evaluated.
+struct B { virtual ~B (); };
+void
+lambda_poly_capture (B& b)
+{
+  [] { (void) typeid (b); };  // { dg-error "not captured" }
+}
+
+// typeid itself inside an unevaluated operand: the polymorphic glvalue
+// re-parse must not force evaluation here.
+void
+nested_unevaluated(B &b)
+{
+  (void) sizeof (typeid (b)); // no odr-use of b expected
+}
+
+// lambda variant of nested_unevaluated.
+void
+nested_unevaluated_lambda(B &b)
+{
+  [] { (void) sizeof (typeid (b)); }; // OK: no capture required
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..422a81fa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid14.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR c++/125886
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#include <typeinfo>
+#include <utility>
+
+// [expr.typeid]/4: a glvalue expression of a polymorphic class type is
+// evaluated, so std::declval<B>() is instantiated and
+// __declval_protector's static_assert fires (the non-template case:
+// the operand is parsed evaluated after the unevaluated probe).
+
+struct B { virtual ~B(); };
+
+void
+non_template ()
+{
+  (void) typeid (std::declval<B> ());
+}
+// { dg-error "static assertion failed: declval" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..76478bed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/typeid15.C
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// PR c++/125886
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#include <typeinfo>
+#include <utility>
+
+// [expr.typeid]/4 for a template-dependent operand: the evaluated/
+// unevaluated decision is taken at instantiation time in tsubst.  For
+// a polymorphic operand the operand is re-substituted evaluated, so
+// std::declval<C>() is instantiated and __declval_protector's
+// static_assert fires.
+
+struct C { virtual ~C(); };
+
+template <typename T>
+void
+tmpl ()
+{
+  (void) typeid (std::declval<T> ());
+}
+
+template void tmpl<C> ();
+// { dg-error "static assertion failed: declval" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to