On 7/7/2026 11:56 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Tue, 2026-07-07 at 23:46 -0600, Jeffrey Law wrote:
On 7/7/2026 11:39 AM, Sam James wrote:
For the PR, we'd love something backportable though, and having a patch
which was never on trunk isn't ideal, though it is quite targeted..
I certainly realize the issues here with wanting something
backportable. But this may be one we just have to live with.
What's the problem with committing & backport the hacky fix now and then,
once the infra for the more ideal solution lands, revert the commit and re-
do it on master?
At least that would give m68k compiler users access to a recent GCC 15 and
GCC 16 today.
Because it's not actually a fix. This problem can show up in many other
places and it's an unmaintainable hack.
jeff
