From: Chao-ying Fu <[email protected]>

Ensure the proper sub-word address is computed
when using built-in atomics on big-endian RISC-V targets.

Without this change, multiple tests were failing, including:
    libatomic.c/atomic-compare-exchange-1.c
    libatomic.c/atomic-compare-exchange-2.c
    libatomic.c/atomic-exchange-1.c
    libatomic.c/atomic-exchange-2.c
    libatomic.c/atomic-op-1.c
    libatomic.c/atomic-op-2.c
    libatomic.c/generic-2.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-3.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-4.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-5.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-6.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-7.c
    gcc.target/riscv/amo/inline-atomics-8.c

The patch was tested using QEMU modified to run big-endian RISC-V
executables [1].

[1] https://github.com/djtodoro/qemu/tree/riscvbe/current#

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Paunovic <[email protected]>

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_subword_address): Add emit_move_insn for 
big-endian.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c: New test.
        * gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c: New test.
---
Changes in v5:
- Drop -O0 from both tests and add a return value to avoid any potential
  DCE issues.
- Move -mbig-endian to dg-additional-options.
- Remove the dg-xfail-if for RVV on big-endian builds.
- Link to v4: 
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/[email protected]/

---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                              |  5 +++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c   | 10 ++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c   | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
 create mode 100644 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 873defc5a5b5..f0fb7ba6c21b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -13523,6 +13523,11 @@ riscv_subword_address (rtx mem, rtx *aligned_mem, rtx 
*shift, rtx *mask,
   /* Calculate the shift amount.  */
   emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_AND (SImode, gen_lowpart (SImode, addr),
                                       gen_int_mode (3, SImode)));
+  if (TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN)
+    emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_XOR (SImode, *shift,
+                                       gen_int_mode (GET_MODE (mem) == QImode
+                                                     ? 3 : 2, SImode)));
+
   emit_move_insn (*shift, gen_rtx_ASHIFT (SImode, *shift,
                                          gen_int_mode (3, SImode)));
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c5dfe374f403
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-hi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-mbig-endian" } */
+/* Verify that subword atomic operations use XOR for big-endian halfword 
alignment.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "xori\\s+\[a-z0-9\]+,\[a-z0-9\]+,2" } } */
+
+short atomic_fetch_add_hi(short *ptr, short val)
+{
+  __atomic_fetch_add(ptr, val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+  return val;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1c37ececf728
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/amo/big-endian-subword-amo-qi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-mbig-endian" } */
+/* Verify that subword atomic operations use XOR for big-endian byte 
alignment.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "xori\\s+\[a-z0-9\]+,\[a-z0-9\]+,3" } } */
+
+char atomic_fetch_add_qi(char *ptr, char val)
+{
+  __atomic_fetch_add(ptr, val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+  return val;
+}
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to