Richard Earnshaw via Sourceware Forge wrote:
Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha) <[email protected]> approved the changes: This seems reasonable to me - it's simply reformatting information already stored in the GCC repository. OK, but please give it until Tuesday in case there are any last minute objections.
I think it is by itself a good idea – but I am not sure "inactive_email" is the right word. There is:
* Non-primary email addresses - like in my case, my private email. Still valid and with FSF assignment, but my work email is my primary one. * Old email addresses due to company-name changes - still valid but not used for new new emails. (I have one of those too.) * Old email addresses - not valid any more, usually because of changing companies. I think inactive is fine for all of those, but we could also have a non_primary one - esp. for some things, I might still use my private email – which is would be more a non_primary_email than inactive_email. Tobias
