On Wed, 5 Aug 2026, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Alexander Monakov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I just noticed the same message is present a few lines below what you
> > patched,
> > under the 'default:' case label and with internal_error_no_backtrace
> > instead of
> > fatal_error.
> >
> > I can probably push the obvious patch to fix that up, just let me know.
>
> Sure, feel free to.
Pushed the following.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gcc.cc (execute) [default]: Use the same wording as above.
---
gcc/gcc.cc | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gcc.cc b/gcc/gcc.cc
index ca4e397bb5cb..973a34023305 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc.cc
+++ b/gcc/gcc.cc
@@ -3564,8 +3564,7 @@ execute (void)
the user or OOM killer nuked it. */
fatal_error (input_location,
"%s terminated by signal %d (%s)",
- commands[i].prog,
- WTERMSIG (status),
+ commands[i].prog, WTERMSIG (status),
strsignal (WTERMSIG (status)));
break;
@@ -3588,9 +3587,9 @@ execute (void)
default:
/* The inferior failed to catch the signal. */
- internal_error_no_backtrace ("%s signal terminated program %s",
- strsignal (WTERMSIG (status)),
- commands[i].prog);
+ internal_error_no_backtrace ("%s terminated by signal %d (%s)",
+ commands[i].prog, WTERMSIG (status),
+ strsignal (WTERMSIG (status)));
}
else if (WIFEXITED (status)
&& WEXITSTATUS (status) >= MIN_FATAL_STATUS)
--
2.51.0
