On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 06:44:35AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 9/2/26 6:07 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > r13-1924-gb9da686470d1c2 avoided threading to probably never executed > > edges but landed without a testcase. Add two, retroactively. > > > > [This is all AI generated. I used it to to go back in time, create > > testcases from the original preprocessed source code, further reduce > > it with cvise, and then distill it further to create a minimal > > reproducer for the concept, not the warning. This allows us to keep > > an reduction of the original testcase, plus a conceptual tiny testcase > > to make sure we don't regress going forward.] > > > > Both FAIL before r13-1924 and PASS with it. > > > > Assisted-by: Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) > > > > OK? > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > PR tree-optimization/106495 > > PR tree-optimization/126906 > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr106495-1.c: New test. > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr106495-2.c: New test. > OK for the trunk. For once the verbosity of an LLM is useful :-) I might
Heh. I did prune it down a bit before submitting :). Aldy
