Ping!
please review. Thanks & Regards Jeevitha On 26/08/26 12:11 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Hi All, > > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on > powerpc64le-linux and powerpc64-linux. > > The vec-permute-ext-runnable.c test uses byte indices in the control > vector that happen to match the little-endian representation of the > vector double values. On Power10 big-endian targets, the same byte > indices select different bytes within the vector double representation > and therefore produce 0.0 instead of the expected -4.0. > > Update the permutation indices to make the test endian-correct. > > 2026-08-26 Jeevitha Palanisamy <[email protected]> > > gcc/testsuite/ > PR target/127030 > * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-permute-ext-runnable.c: Fix the > byte permutation indices for big-endian targets. > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-permute-ext-runnable.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-permute-ext-runnable.c > index f8332652b47..d6bed5120b9 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-permute-ext-runnable.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-permute-ext-runnable.c > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv []) > vsrc_b_d = (vector double) { 2.0, -4.0 }; > vsrc_c_uchar = (vector unsigned char) { 0x0, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3, > 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, > - 0x1A, 0x1B, 0x1C, 0x1B, > + 0x18, 0x19, 0x1A, 0x1B, > 0x1C, 0x1D, 0x1E, 0x1F }; > vresult_d = (vector double) { 0.0, 0.0 }; > expected_vresult_d = (vector double) { 1.0, -4.0 }; >
