From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <[email protected]>
For the subsequent patch I need the number of mnemonics. Instead of
introducing a new named constant which may potentially clash with a
mnemonic, I went for a new preprocessor definition
ATTR_ENUM_MNEMONIC_COUNT. Though, if there are reasons to choose a
named constant instaed, I'm fine with this, too.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* genattr-common.cc (gen_attr): New preprocessor definition
ATTR_ENUM_MNEMONIC_COUNT.
---
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux and s390x-linux. Ok for
mainline?
gcc/genattr-common.cc | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/genattr-common.cc b/gcc/genattr-common.cc
index 4d000c81fa9..20138333c0a 100644
--- a/gcc/genattr-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/genattr-common.cc
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static void
gen_attr (md_rtx_info *info)
{
const char *p, *tag;
+ size_t count = 0;
rtx attr = info->def;
p = XSTR (attr, 1);
@@ -55,8 +56,11 @@ gen_attr (md_rtx_info *info)
putchar (TOUPPER (*tag++));
if (*p == ',')
fputs (", ", stdout);
+ ++count;
}
fputs ("};\n", stdout);
+ if (strcmp (XSTR (attr, 0), "mnemonic") == 0)
+ printf ("#define ATTR_ENUM_MNEMONIC_COUNT %zu\n", count);
}
}
--
2.55.0
