This adds a pattern to optimize `minmax (a - c, b) + c` into `minmax (a, b + 
c)` when
`b + c` is known not to overflow.

This is a simplified version from previous one where we only handle the `a - c` 
case
rather than the generic

This shows up in std::vector::push_back :

```
  # RANGE [irange] const size_type [0, 2147483647] MASK 0x7fffffff VALUE 0x0
  __room_33 = 2147483647 - _32;
...
  # RANGE [irange] long unsigned int [1, 2147483646] MASK 0x7fffffff VALUE 0x0
  _35 = MIN_EXPR <__room_33, _34>;
  # RANGE [irange] long unsigned int [1, 4294967292]
  _36 = _32 + _35;
```
_32 has a range of `[0, 2147483647]`, _34 has a range of `[1, 2147483646]`.

This is transformed into:
_t = _32 + _34;
_36 = MIN_EXPR<_t, 2147483647>

This then allows to remove a condition that was never could be executed too.

This is currently limited to unsigned types as overflow_free_p does not tell
me if we are going to introduce new undefined overflow; it will return true for
all TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED types.  I filed PR 127356 to add a modified version
of overflow_free_p.  But since the types in push_back is unsigned this is enough
for now.  When that goes in; I will combine r17-4210-g9d734bb468e714 with this
pattern and remove the special case of 0.

Changes since v1:
 * v2: Only handle the case where we have `a - c` as the operand to minmax.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

        PR tree-optimization/127103
gcc/ChangeLog:

        * match.pd (`minmax (a - c, b) + c`): New pattern.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c: New test.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>
---
 gcc/match.pd                                  | 11 ++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 82cf6ae0a3c..1c0393d11cd 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -532,6 +532,17 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
    (if (gimple_match_range_of_expr (vr0, @0, @2)
        && range_op_handler (PLUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr0))
     (max (plus @0 @0) @1)))))
+/* minmax (a - c, b) + c -> minmax (a, b + c) if b+c don't overflow.  */
+(for minmax (min max)
+ (simplify
+  (plus:c @0 (minmax:cs@3 (minus @1 @0) @2))
+  (with { int_range_max vr0, vr2; }
+   (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
+       && gimple_match_range_of_expr (vr0, @0)
+       && gimple_match_range_of_expr (vr2, @2, @3)
+       && range_op_handler (PLUS_EXPR).overflow_free_p (vr0, vr2))
+    (minmax @1 (plus @2 @0))))))
+
 #endif
 
 /* X * 1, X / 1 -> X.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..75067fdb962
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-plus-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized-raw" } */
+/* minmax (a, b) + c -> minmax (a + c, b + c) */
+/* PR tree-optimization/127103 */
+
+__attribute__((always_inline))
+static inline unsigned
+min(unsigned a, unsigned b)
+{
+  if (a > b)
+    return b;
+  return a;
+}
+__attribute__((always_inline))
+static inline unsigned
+max(unsigned a, unsigned b)
+{
+  if (a < b)
+    return b;
+  return a;
+}
+
+unsigned f(unsigned a, unsigned t1)
+{
+  if (a > __INT_MAX__)
+    return 0;
+  unsigned t = __INT_MAX__ - a;
+  return a + min(t, a);
+}
+
+unsigned f1(unsigned a, unsigned t1)
+{
+  if (a > __INT_MAX__)
+    return 0;
+  unsigned t = __INT_MAX__ - a;
+  return a + max(t, a);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "gimple_assign <mult_expr, _\[0-9\], 
a_\[0-9\].D., 2" 2 "optimized" } } */
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to