On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:37 PM Yongqiang Tian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks. I tested the exact submitted patch, commit > 11905168b920c34ac2c4cebebf786b52836294c0, against the unmodified > baseline at f311d59c4d45f5042029647c88966e2e48330adf. > > For the native testing, build, host, and target were all > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I configured both trees with: > > configure --disable-multilib > > and ran: > > make -j8 bootstrap > make -j8 -k check > > The bootstrap and complete testsuite run finished successfully. Comparing > the generated .sum files against the baseline showed no new FAIL, XPASS, > ERROR, or UNRESOLVED results. The seven pre-existing unexpected outcomes > were identical between the baseline and patched trees. > > I also built a C/LTO cross compiler with build and host > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu. The new > gcc.dg/pr127422.c regression test passes with the patch. The testcase > reproduces the -fcompare-debug failure on the unmodified compiler and > passes after the change. > > I do not have GCC write access, so I would appreciate it if someone could > commit the patch if the testing is sufficient.
I have pushed this. I'll note the commit checker does not like the Assisted-By tags placed at the Signed-off-by position, instead it seems it should be at the end of the description. Richard.
