On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 10:44 PM Yongqiang Tian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks. I agree that skipping DEBUG_INSNs can increase the search work for > debug-heavy testcases, but it seems preferable to letting debug information > change the ordinary-instruction search budget. > > I tested the exact submitted patch, commit > 63bd684c3c02021fe4c6b9a3247aaeecd19ef020, against the unmodified > baseline at f311d59c4d45f5042029647c88966e2e48330adf. > > For the native testing, build, host, and target were all > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I configured both trees with: > > configure --disable-multilib > > and ran: > > make -j8 bootstrap > make -j8 -k check > > The bootstrap and complete testsuite run finished successfully. Comparing > the generated .sum files against the baseline showed no new FAIL, XPASS, > ERROR, or UNRESOLVED results. The seven pre-existing unexpected outcomes > were identical between the baseline and patched trees. > > I also built a C cross compiler with build and host x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > and target sparc-elf, then ran: > > make -j8 all-gcc > make -C gcc check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=gcc.target/sparc/sparc.exp=pr127421.c > > The new gcc.target/sparc/pr127421.c regression test passes with the patch. > > I do not have GCC write access, so I would appreciate it if someone could > commit the patch if the testing is sufficient.
I have pushed the patch. Richard.
