>
>
> Is AI experimenting with announcing AI policy  ?

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Wakely via Sourceware Forge <
> [email protected]>
> To: gcc-patches mailing list <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 08:48:39 +0000
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add news announcement of AI Policy
> Nobody should be merging pull requests here anyway, this is a read only
> mirror of the real repo. Changes need to be committed to the real repo, not
> here.
>
> So squash the commits on the command line then push to the real repo from
> the command line.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ForgeExperiment#Monitoring_and_merging_changes
>
> --
> https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-wwwdocs/pulls/3#issuecomment-7533
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]>
> To: Albon Wu <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 11:18:08 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Make constexpr initializer_list a C++14
> feature [PR113782]
> On Fri, 18 Sept 2026 at 14:35, Albon Wu (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEX)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > libstdc++ declares multiple methods on initializer_list as constexpr
> > unconditionally, but N3471 only added these in C++14, so in C++11 this is
> > non-conforming. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113782
> >
> > This also covers the private constructor of initializer_list, meaning it
> is
> > no longer a literal type in C++11. Some unrelated tests that used
> constexpr
> > initializer_list implicitly are retargeted to C++14.
> >
> > Built and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Okay for trunk?
>
> Thanks for the patch. My concern with this approach is that it's a
> breaking change for anybody who is (inadvertently or intentionally)
> relying on this non-conforming behaviour. The benefit of rejecting the
> code is minimal - does it actually do any harm?
>
> So I would prefer to keep these functions as constexpr for
> -std=gnu++11 and only change -std=c++11
>
>

Reply via email to