On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 8:50 PM Jeff Law <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 9/27/26 8:07 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Set reasonable values for the INT/FP/VEC reassociation widths. I was > > able to measure a significant speedup on a dependent FP chain (almost > > 2x faster) with this applied. I wasn't able to measure a clear > > improvement on integer and vector, but I chose conservative values > > for both. > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/riscv/riscv.cc (tt_ascalon_d8_tune_info): Set > > int_reassoc_width, fp_reassoc_width, and vec_reassoc_width. > Ultimately I think this for you and Peter to reach consensus on. Y'all > know this design far better than anyone else where, second guessing > would be a bit silly. So OK pending ack from Peter. Similarly for the > loop unrolling patch. > > If Peter is delegating to you, then I'd suggest you get commit privs so > you can push this kind of stuff for your design forward. > > http://gcc.gnu/org/gitwrite.html should have a pointer to the magic form > to fill out. List Peter or I as approving.
Hmm, I thought Anton already had a sourceware account; if so please follow the directions on that page (https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html) on how to handle in that way. You basically will do an email instead of filling out the link. Yes you should list Jeff or Peter (or you can use me too). Thanks, Andrea > > jeff
