On 02/10/26 9:43 pm, Manjunath S Matti wrote:
> Add the int128 effective-target requirement, the test then
> becomes UNSUPPORTED for -m32 and is unchanged for -m64 on both
> endiannesses.
>
Just a small wording change: use "int128 effective-target check"
instead of "int128 effective-target requirement"?
Other than this small change, it looks correct.
Thanks,
Jeevitha.
> Tested on powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m64 and -m32) and
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu.
>
> 2026-10-02 Manjunath Matti <[email protected]>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/127278
> * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-msumc.c: Add int128
> effective-target.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-msumc.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-msumc.c
> index 524a2225c6c..c9db899c2f9 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-msumc.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-msumc.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do run { target { power10_hw } } } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target power10_ok } */
> /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -O2" } */
> #include <altivec.h>
