On 10/15/12 17:51:14, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Gary Funck <g...@intrepid.com> wrote: [...] > > UPC-Related Front-End Changes > > ----------------------------- > > > > GCC's internal tree representation is > > extended to record the UPC "shared", > > "strict", "relaxed" qualifiers, > > and the layout qualifier. [...] > > What immediately comes to my mind is that apart from parsing > the core machinery should be shareable with Cilk+, no?
I haven't looked at Cilk in detail, but my understanding is that Cilk and UPC have different runtime models, and clearly different language syntax and semantics. Perhaps those knowledgeable in the Cilk implementation can comment further. - Gary
