On 2026/10/10 11:03, Jonathan Yong wrote: > On 10/9/26 14:59, Zhongteng Gui wrote: >> >> Fine. I've successfully built native Cygwin gcc with cygport and my patch >> (v3, since cygport doesn't autoreconf) applied. Nothing breaks, I espcially >> checked >> gcc -xc++ /dev/null -E -v for the default search paths. > > Is the only difference in v3 the addition of the pregenerated changes in > configure? Is the v2 patch sent earlier sufficient?
Yes, the only code difference is to regenerate configure. I also revised the commit message. v2 patch is sufficient if you ran autoreconf before configure, i.e. in MSYS2's build process.
