"Pietro Monteiro" <[email protected]> writes:

> I retested the patch and there are no changes to the generated files
> in GCC, binutils-gdb and newlib-cygwin trees when the following files
> are removed.

LGTM. It will also make other work easier as it reduces files to check.

Jeff or Andrea, could you take a quick look?

>
> pietro
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026, at 8:35 PM, Pietro Monteiro wrote:
>> Gentle ping.
>>
>> pietro
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025, at 12:22 PM, Pietro Monteiro wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Pietro Monteiro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Both GCC and binutils/gdb trees do not use any of the macros defined
>>>>> in these files.  Removing them from both trees and regenerating the
>>>>> build scripts results in no diff.
>>>>
>>>> Can you confirm they're also not used in newlib-cygwin, the other tree 
>>>> sharing this toplevel build system?
>>>
>>> Yes, I just tested and they are not used by newlib. BTW,
>>> ax_lib_socket_nsl.m4 is not in the newlib tree. There's a diff in the
>>> regenerated config files, but that's unrelated and happens without
>>> removing the files on this patch.
>>>
>>> pietro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to