This is a summary of discussions relative to the merge request created by Torbjörn Svensson (azoff) <[email protected]> titled pr/config/zstd.m4 since its creation.
Description: Hi, I noticed that building GDB and other tools in binutils did not take the path given to --with-zstd into account. In my case, I have a system wide zstd dynamic library, but my build should use a static library instead. I thus, build zstd as a static library and point configure to this location. The [feedback](https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151700.html) on my [binutils patch](https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2026-September/151690.html) was that I should do the change in the GCC tree and then sync that back to binutils. Changes since v1: - Unify the interface for the consumers of the macro on ZSTD_CFLAGS and ZSTD_LIBS for the result. - Use lowercase variable names for all local variables. Ok for trunk? Kind regards, Torbjörn -- TO: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]> CC: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> CC: Richard Biener <[email protected]> CC: Simon Marchi <[email protected]> The full and up to date discussion can be found at https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc/pulls/236 The merge request has been closed without being merged directly on the forge repository. On 2026-10-19 05:57:19+00:00, Torbjörn Svensson (azoff) wrote: Closed in favor of https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc/pulls/248.
