Hi again,

On 10/18/2012 06:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/18/2012 01:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If I understand correctly your hesitations, I don't think there are
exceptions to the general rule that if the size of the array is zero
there can be no initializers.

I'm thinking of a testcase like this, which is currently accepted:

struct A
{
  int i[0];
  int j;
};

struct A a = { 1 };

Here, since i has no elements, we should skip over it and apply the one initializer to j.
Thus, I looked into what you did lately for c++/54441, and the below is what I regtested so far: I'm directly recognizing the situations leading to infinite loops. Note, I don't exclude that formally the whole iteration could be streamlined a bit, but like this it seems still quite understandable.

Tested x86_64-linux as usual..

Thanks,
Paolo.

///////////////////////////
/cp
2012-10-18  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/54501
        * decl.c (reshape_init_array_1): Avoid infinite loops.

/testsuite
2012-10-18  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>

        PR c++/54501
        * g++.dg/init/array30.C: New.
        * g++.dg/init/array31.C: Likewise.
Index: cp/decl.c
===================================================================
--- cp/decl.c   (revision 192569)
+++ cp/decl.c   (working copy)
@@ -5040,6 +5040,7 @@ reshape_init_array_1 (tree elt_type, tree max_inde
        ++index)
     {
       tree elt_init;
+      constructor_elt *old_cur = d->cur;
 
       check_array_designated_initializer (d->cur, index);
       elt_init = reshape_init_r (elt_type, d, /*first_initializer_p=*/false,
@@ -5050,6 +5051,10 @@ reshape_init_array_1 (tree elt_type, tree max_inde
                              size_int (index), elt_init);
       if (!TREE_CONSTANT (elt_init))
        TREE_CONSTANT (new_init) = false;
+
+      /* This can happen with an invalid initializer (c++/54501).  */
+      if (d->cur == old_cur && !sized_array_p)
+       break;
     }
 
   return new_init;
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/init/array30.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/init/array30.C     (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/init/array30.C     (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/54501
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+int main()
+{
+  int a[][0] = {0};  // { dg-error "too many" }
+}
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/init/array31.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/init/array31.C     (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/init/array31.C     (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/54501
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+struct A
+{
+  int i[0];
+  int j;
+};
+
+struct A a = { 1 };

Reply via email to