On 10/23/2012 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:21:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/23/2012 02:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+static bool
+cond_arg_set_in_bb (edge e, basic_block bb, int n)
+{
+ ssa_op_iter iter;
+ use_operand_p use_p;
+ gimple last = gsi_stmt (gsi_last_bb (e->dest));
Use gimple last = last_stmt (e->dest); instead? That way any possible
debug stmts are ignored.
I thought I'd already dealt with this before. I'll double-check and
take appropriate action.
Any opinions about pulling it into 4.7.x as that release is affected
by this codegen bug? I've got no strong opinions and I'm willing to
pull it onto the branch if you want it.
I think it should be backported to 4.7, perhaps with a few days delay after the
trunk commit.
Do we even have debug statements after control flow statements?
jeff
