On 10/30/2012 07:44 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
straightforward fix. The below, which regtests fine, simply acts on any MULT_EXPR as TYPE_SIZE, which I think should be fine, but, in case the idea is basically Ok, we could also consider the more complex but more sophisticated variably_modified_type_p?
I think I'd use EXPR_P rather than check for a particular tree code. Jason
