On 11/1/12, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> This patch normalizes more bitmap function names. >> >> sbitmap.h >> >> TEST_BIT -> bitmap_bit_p >> SET_BIT -> bitmap_set_bit > > I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became > bitmap_test_bit() ? I never particularly liked the lispy *_p > convention. But I don't really care much one way or the other.
The plan was to simply use the bitmap names, and given the schedule I would prefer to leave it as is. > The patch is OK. Okay. I will merge and commit. -- Lawrence Crowl
