On 11/29/2012 12:45 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/11/29 Pedro Alves <pal...@redhat.com>:
>> On 11/29/2012 12:03 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this trivial patch fixes a bootstrap issue on LLP64 hosts.
>>
>> But it's trivial at the expense of truncating the pointer.
>> Looking around, I'd think that something like casting to hwi (after 
>> uintptr_t),
>> and then use HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX as format would be the gcc way.
>>
>>> Index: cp/class.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- cp/class.c  (Revision 193925)
>>> +++ cp/class.c  (Arbeitskopie)
>>> @@ -7817,7 +7817,7 @@ dump_class_hierarchy_r (FILE *stream,
>>>    indented = maybe_indent_hierarchy (stream, indent, 0);
>>>    fprintf (stream, "%s (0x%lx) ",
>>>            type_as_string (BINFO_TYPE (binfo), TFF_PLAIN_IDENTIFIER),
>>> -          (unsigned long) binfo);
>>> +          (unsigned long) (uintptr_t) binfo);
>>

> Well, hwi format is of course the way to display pointer complete.  On
> the other hand are in most cases lower 32-bit sufficent on
> debug-output.

But what's the point of not making it complete?  It's not like we're talking
about a large amount of work to get it right.  It should be a two-line patch?

-- 
Pedro Alves

Reply via email to