On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote:
> I saw only one test case fix patch from Paolo in trunk. Does this
> patch include more local fixes?
There was an earlier patch which touched g++.dg/parse/error1{1,2}.C:
r191712 | paolo | 2012-09-25 07:44:52 -0700 (Tue, 25 Sep 2012) | 15 lines
/cp
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/54526
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_id): In C++11 mode simply accept
X<::A>.
/testsuite
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/54526
* g++.dg/cpp0x/parse2.C: New.
* g++.dg/parse/error11.C: Adjust.
* g++.dg/parse/error12.C: Likewise.
The r194909 reverted parser.c change, but didn't revert error1{1,2}.C changes.
Current state of trunk vs. google/gcc-4_7 branch:
diff -u ${trunk}/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error11.C
${gcc-4_7}/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error11.C
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@
// On the first error message, an additional note about the use of
// -fpermissive should be present
-// { dg-message "17:\\(if you use '-fpermissive' or '-std=c\\+\\+11',
or '-std=gnu\\+\\+11' G\\+\\+ will accept your code\\)" "-fpermissive"
{ target c++98 } 19 }
+// { dg-message "17:\\(if you use '-fpermissive' G\\+\\+ will accept
your code\\)" "-fpermissive" { target c++98 } 19 }
(Minor adjustment to the expected error message).
error12.C is identical on trunk and google/gcc-4_7.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
