Hi Maintainers,

The attached patch backports the gcc trunk patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00143.html to
"ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch" branch.

ChangeLog.aarch64

2013-01-27 Venkataramanan Kumar  <venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org>

        Backport from mainline.
        2013-01-04  Andrew Pinski  <apin...@cavium.com>

        * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_fixed_condition_code_regs):
        New function.
        (TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS): Define

Path is attached. Please let me know if I can change "-1" to
"INVALID_REGNUM" and commit.

Built gcc and tested the gcc testsuites for the aarch64-none-elf
target with ARMv8 Foundation model. No new regressions.

Ok to for the ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch ?

regards,
Venkat.
Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c        (revision 195486)
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c        (working copy)
@@ -2971,6 +2971,16 @@
   return REAL_VALUES_EQUAL (r, dconst0);
 }
 
+/* Return the fixed registers used for condition codes.  */
+
+static bool
+aarch64_fixed_condition_code_regs (unsigned int *p1, unsigned int *p2)
+{
+  *p1 = CC_REGNUM;
+  *p2 = -1;
+  return true;
+}
+
 enum machine_mode
 aarch64_select_cc_mode (RTX_CODE code, rtx x, rtx y)
 {
@@ -7809,6 +7819,9 @@
 #undef TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN_VA_START
 #define TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN_VA_START aarch64_expand_builtin_va_start
 
+#undef TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REG
+#define TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS aarch64_fixed_condition_code_regs
+
 #undef TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG
 #define TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG aarch64_function_arg
 
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cmp-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cmp-1.c    (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cmp-1.c    (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+int f(int a, int b)
+{
+  if(a<b)
+    return 1;
+  if(a>b)
+    return -1;
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* We should optimize away the second cmp. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmp\tw" 1 } } */
+

Reply via email to