On 02/08/2013 12:20 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:56:48PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* Check the headers. */
+ FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
+ {
+ /* Skip BBs in the root tree. */
+ if (bb->loop_father == current_loops->tree_root)
+ continue;
You shouldn't need this ... it will miss missing toplevel loops
Done.
+ if (bb_loop_header_p (bb))
+ if (bb->loop_father->header != bb)
&& bb->loop_father->header != bb)
Fixed. Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64 again (with tailc fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00310.html), ok now?
Ok. Let's watch for fallout...
Thanks,
Richard.
Maybe here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-02/msg00835.html
?
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
