Is it OK for wwdocs? Index: gcc-4.8/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.96 diff -u -r1.96 changes.html --- gcc-4.8/changes.html 12 Feb 2013 16:33:58 -0000 1.96 +++ gcc-4.8/changes.html 13 Feb 2013 08:24:53 -0000 @@ -529,6 +529,10 @@ information. </li> <li> Windows MinGW-w64 targets (<code>*-w64-mingw*</code>) require at least r5437 from the Mingw-w64 trunk. </li> + <li>Support for new AMD family 15h processors (Steamroller core) is now available + through <code>-march=bdver3</code> and <code>-mtune=bdver3</code> options.</li> + <li>Support for new AMD family 16h processors (Jaguar core) is now available + through <code>-march=btver2</code> and <code>-mtune=btver2</code> options.</li> </ul>
<h3 id="frv">FRV</h3> -----Original Message----- From: Mikael Morin [mailto:mikael.mo...@sfr.fr] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:38 PM To: Richard Biener Cc: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; ubizjak at gmail dot com (gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org); ger...@pfeifer.com Subject: Re: [patch][wwwdocs] gcc 4.8 changes - AMD new cores Le 13/02/2013 14:00, Richard Biener a écrit : > Of course not. Next they'll add blver ... Sorry