On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> attached is an updated version of the patch, which address the raised issues
> and some minor problems and omissions I found.
>
> OK for the trunk?
+For Boolean (@code{LOGICAL}) arguments, please note that GCC expects
+only the integer value 0 and 1. If a GNU Fortran @code{LOGICAL}
+variable contains another integer value, the result is undefined.
+As some other Fortran compilers use @math{-1} for @code{.TRUE.},
+extra care has to be taken -- such as passing the value as
+@code{INTEGER}. (The same value restriction also applies to other
+front ends of GCC, e.g. to GCC's C99 compiler for @code{_Bool}
+or GCC's Ada compiler for @code{Complex}.)
Presumably you meant Ada's @code{Bool} (or whatever the Ada boolean
type is called)?
Ok with that change.
--
Janne Blomqvist
