On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 19:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Graham Stott wrote: > > Steven, > > > > The new execute mips_machine_reorrg2 part of the patch doesn't have a > > return value! > > Right, brilliant... Thanks for spotting that. > > Steve, can you try this, please? > > > Index: config/mips/mips.c > =================================================================== > --- config/mips/mips.c (revision 198640) > +++ config/mips/mips.c (working copy) > @@ -16388,6 +16388,7 @@ mips_machine_reorg2 (void) > optimizations, but this should be an extremely rare case anyhow. */ > mips_reorg_process_insns (); > mips16_split_long_branches (); > + return 0; > } > > struct rtl_opt_pass pass_mips_machine_reorg2 =
Yes, this fixed my build. Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com
