> Looks good to me. Great, trunk patch in.
> Will you prepare corresponding patch for the 4.8 > branch too (I guess it should be pretty much the same, not sure if it > should keep using typedef system_clock steady_clock as before for the > non-MONOTONIC configuration, or if it should just do the same thing > as trunk)? Same thing, I think. Testing now, ok when it completes? -benjamin
