2013/6/18 Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Andreas Krebbel
> <kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the patch replaces next_real_insn with next_active_insn when checking
>> for JUMP TABLE insns.
>>
>> This fixes ESA mode bootstrap on s390 which broke with r197266.
>>
>> Comitted to mainline
>
> Please revert this and find another solution. JUMP_TABLE_DATA is not
> an active insn, and I will be removing it soon from active_insn_p.
>
> How big does a FIXME have to be for people to notice?
>
> Ciao!
> Steven

Hi, Steven,

Do you mean that your comment 6 in PR56809 is not a good solution
since you are going to remove JUMP_TABLE_DAT from active_insn_p ??

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809



Best regards,
jasonwucj

Reply via email to