On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Quoting Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr>:
The issue seems larger than just short/int. On x86, (l<l)<l fails to
compile for a vector of long, with l<l that has opaque type vector of
int, that seems wrong.
I don't understand what you mean here. Could you post the actual code
sample?
typedef long vl __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
void f(vl l){
(l<l)<l;
}
it compiles fine on x86_64 but not on x86.
(btw, my sentence was ambiguous, what I find wrong is the failure to
compile, not the type of l<l)
--
Marc Glisse
