On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> writes: >>Trever Saunders <tsaund...@mozilla.com> writes: >>> Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: >>> > Btw, I've come around multiple coding-styles in the past and I >>> > definitely would prefer m_mode / m_count to mark members vs. mode_ and >>> > count_. (and s_XXX for static members IIRC). >>> >>> I'd prefer m_/s_foo for members / static things too fwiw. >> >> Me as well. It's still ugly, but not so unsymmetric as the trailing >> underscore. > > Well, I'm not sure how I came to be the one writing these patches, > but I suppose I prefer m_foo too. So how about the attached? > > The first patch has changes to the coding conventions. I added > some missing spaces while there. > > The second patch has the mechanical code changes. The reason for > yesterday's mass adding of spaces was because the second patch would > have been pretty inconsistent otherwise. > > Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > Richard > >
