Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Some of the things I've done in 4.8 to improve SH T bit handling turned
> out to produce wrong code. The attached patch fixes that by introducing
> an SH specific RTL pass.
>
> Tested on rev 202876 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> and no new failures.
> Additional test cases will follow.
> OK for trunk?
I've got a new failure with the patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu:
New tests that FAIL:
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_7.f90 execution, -O3 -g
> ifcvt_sh
We usually use sh_/sh- prefix for target specific things, don't we?
I'm not sure that there is some rigid naming convention for them,
though.
Regards,
kaz
