On 10/10/2013 08:33 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ expr_type = TREE_TYPE (expr) = cp_build_qualified_type + (TREE_TYPE (expr), cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (probe_type)));
Won't that end up being the same as the contents of expr_type before this statement? Can we just remove this assignment?
Also, clobbering TREE_TYPE (expr) strikes me as a bad idea. Jason
