On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01 Oct 20:00, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> This is OK for mainline, on the condition that target independent part
>> is approved and committed first.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Uros.
>
> Thanks for review!
>
> Attached is a version to be committed. The only difference from the previous
> one is BOUND_MODE renamed to POINTER_BOUNDS_MODE due to changes in target
> independent part. ChangeLog was not modified.
I think you missed a couple of length -> length_nobnd updates:
@@ -11635,7 +11680,12 @@
[(simple_return)
(unspec [(const_int 0)] UNSPEC_REP)]
"reload_completed"
- "rep%; ret"
+{
+ if (ix86_bnd_prefixed_insn_p (insn))
+ return "%!ret";
+
+ return "rep%; ret";
+}
[(set_attr "length" "2")
(set_attr "atom_unit" "jeu")
(set_attr "length_immediate" "0")
and possibly here:
@@ -11186,7 +11231,7 @@
(define_insn "*indirect_jump"
[(set (pc) (match_operand:W 0 "indirect_branch_operand" "rw"))]
""
- "jmp\t%A0"
+ "%!jmp\t%A0"
[(set_attr "type" "ibr")
(set_attr "length_immediate" "0")])
@@ -11235,7 +11280,7 @@
[(set (pc) (match_operand:W 0 "indirect_branch_operand" "rw"))
(use (label_ref (match_operand 1)))]
""
- "jmp\t%A0"
+ "%!jmp\t%A0"
[(set_attr "type" "ibr")
(set_attr "length_immediate" "0")])
Uros.
